Both the Kerberos server and Microsoft® provide Kerberos security
for your network. While the technology is the same, the terminology
varies.
Kerberos authentication depends upon establishing trust between
users and services through a trusted third party called a Key Distribution Center
(KDC). HP provides a KDC on the security server, and Windows 2000
provides a KDC on the domain controller.
Each KDC stores information about trusted users and services
in a central database called the principal database in HP terms
and the Active Directory of the domain in Microsoft terms. Each
database contains a collection of users. In HP terms, the database
contains a collection called a realm and each entry is called a
principal. In Microsoft terms, the database contains a collection
called a domain and each entry is called an account.
The most important information associated with any principal
in the Kerberos model is its unique symmetric key, that is, the
key used to encrypt and decrypt information on behalf of the principal.
HP uses the term, secret key; Microsoft uses the terms long-term
key or shared principal key. The KDC, as the trusted third party,
shares a unique secret key with all of its principals. When a principal
and the KDC exchange information to establish trust, the principal
uses its secret key to encrypt the message. The KDC decrypts the
message using the secret key of the principal stored in the database
and then attempts to authenticate the principal.
During logon, if KDC successfully authenticates the user,
it responds with a special message, called a ticket granting ticket
(TGT). The ticket entitles you to request access to other services
known to the KDC.
The client system stores the ticket in memory. In HP terminology,
the client system stores the ticket in the credentials cache and
uses it to request service tickets to authenticate the applications
or services on the network. In Microsoft terminology, the client
system stores the ticket in the secure cache and uses it to request
session tickets to authenticate to applications or services.
The HP and Microsoft implementations of Kerberos have virtually identical
conceptual frameworks, but mechanical differences exist. For example,
the HP implementation uses configuration files to locate host systems
and the Microsoft implementation uses a DNS lookup to resolve host
names. But both implementations are written to RFC 1510 (The Kerberos Network
Authentication Service (V5)) and RFC 1964 (The Kerberos Version 5 GSS-API
Mechanism), and hence they can interoperate.
Table 4-1 “Table of Analogous Terms” summarizes analogous
terminology in the Kerberos server and Windows 2000 Kerberos implementations.
Table 4-1 Table of Analogous Terms
Kerberos Server | Windows 2000 |
|---|
| Realm | Domain |
| Interrealm | Interdomain Crossdomain Crossrealm |
Secret key | Longterm key Shared principal key |
| Credentials cache | Secure cache |
| Principal database | Active directory |
| Service ticket | Session ticket |
| Security server | Domain controller |
| Principal names | Account names |